A comprehensive comparison of key specifications between the 1928 Ac 16 40 and the 81 Tvr Tasmin 200 Convertible. To facilitate a clear understanding, we've organized the essential data into a concise table for your convenience.

To sum it up, we've put together a convenient table below, summarizing the key specifications of 1928 Ac 16 40 and 81 Tvr Tasmin 200 Convertible. Whether you're drawn to 1928 Ac 16 40's practicality or 81 Tvr Tasmin 200 Convertible's beauty, this comparison will help you make an informed decision:

Cars
	1928 AC 16/40	1981 TVR Tasmin 200 Convertible
Show All | Hide All
General
Body Details
Brakes
Chassis & Geomtry
Front suspension	LA.QE.
Length:Wheelbase Ratio	1.35
Rear suspension	LA.QE.
Dimensions
Length	3886mm	4010mm
Track/tread (front)	1226mm
Track/tread (rear)	1226mm
Wheelbase	2883mm
Width	1600mm	1730mm
Engine details
Aspiration	Normal
Bore × Stroke	65 × 100mm
Bore/stroke ratio	0.65
Capacity	2 litre (1991 cc)
Catalytic converter	N
Compression Ratio	6.24:1
Cylinders	Straight 6
Engine coolant	Water
Engine layout	longitudinal
Engine manufacturer	AC
Engine position	front
Engine Type	naturally aspirated petrol
Specific output	28.1bhp/litre
Top gear ratio	4.5
Fuel Consump.
Fuel system	1 Ze carb
Performance
Drive wheels	rear wheel drive
maximum power output	57 PS (56 bhp) (42 kW)at 3500 rpm
Maximum speed	129km/h	187km/h
Prices
Saftey
Wheels & Tyres
Aerodynamics
Other
RAC rating	15.7
Unitary capacity	331.83cc
Valve gear	single overhead camshaft (SOHC), 2 valves per cylinder, 12 valves in total

In conclusion, the 1928 Ac 16 40 and 81 Tvr Tasmin 200 Convertible are two distinct cars and your choice ultimately boils down to your individual preferences and priorities. We hope this analysis aids you in your automotive journey, helping you find the perfect fit for your needs and desires.