A comprehensive comparison of key specifications between the 1928 Ac 16 40 and the 81 Tvr Tasmin 200 Convertible. To facilitate a clear understanding, we've organized the essential data into a concise table for your convenience.

To sum it up, we've put together a convenient table below, summarizing the key specifications of 1928 Ac 16 40 and 81 Tvr Tasmin 200 Convertible. Whether you're drawn to 1928 Ac 16 40's practicality or 81 Tvr Tasmin 200 Convertible's beauty, this comparison will help you make an informed decision:

Cars

General
Body Details
Brakes
Chassis & Geomtry
Front suspensionLA.QE.
Length:Wheelbase Ratio1.35
Rear suspensionLA.QE.
Dimensions
Length3886mm4010mm
Track/tread (front)1226mm
Track/tread (rear)1226mm
Wheelbase2883mm
Width1600mm1730mm
Engine details
AspirationNormal
Bore × Stroke65 × 100mm
Bore/stroke ratio0.65
Capacity2 litre (1991 cc)
Catalytic converterN
Compression Ratio6.24:1
CylindersStraight 6
Engine coolantWater
Engine layoutlongitudinal
Engine manufacturerAC
Engine positionfront
Engine Typenaturally aspirated petrol
Specific output28.1bhp/litre
Top gear ratio4.5
Fuel Consump.
Fuel system1 Ze carb
Performance
Drive wheelsrear wheel drive
maximum power output57 PS (56 bhp) (42 kW)at 3500 rpm
Maximum speed129km/h187km/h
Prices
Saftey
Wheels & Tyres
Aerodynamics
Other
RAC rating15.7
Unitary capacity331.83cc
Valve gearsingle overhead camshaft (SOHC), 2 valves per cylinder, 12 valves in total
Annonces parrainées

Use code carsaddiction for 20% off!

In conclusion, the 1928 Ac 16 40 and 81 Tvr Tasmin 200 Convertible are two distinct cars and your choice ultimately boils down to your individual preferences and priorities. We hope this analysis aids you in your automotive journey, helping you find the perfect fit for your needs and desires.